‘Owaisi is harassing this thing, somewhere Madni faction …’, BJP leader Amit Malviya’s taut; Said- Muslim leaders vied for protest

Opposition and some Muslim leaders have filed a petition in the Supreme Court regarding the Waqf law. In such a situation, now BJP leader and BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya has taken a dig at Muslim leaders in the competition of Muslim votes. He has written on the ex platform of his social media account that these leaders who oppose the Waqf law are presenting themselves as the patron of Muslim votes. In such a situation, MP from Hyderabad and AIMIM Chief Asaduddin Owaisi is afraid that the entire credit should not be killed.

AIMPLB does not want to look silent in matters related to Muslim interests. The same applies to other Muslim petitioners, including Imran Masood, Imran Pratapgarhi and others who are trying to keep their parties relevant in Muslim politics. At the same time, some so -called secular leaders like West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee have moved a step further to incite communal riots to maintain their suzerainty over the Muslim vote bank. In this game to overtake each other among competitive groups for Muslim votes, poor Muslims are suffering, while the valuable time of the public is wasting.

Amit Malviya wrote on X, ‘Protests filed against the amended Waqf Act by various Muslim leaders and organizations and petitions are nothing more than efforts to establish themselves as the patron of Muslim votes. Asaduddin Owaisi is making himself vocal to ensure that Mahmood Madni faction does not take all the credit. The Waqf Amendment Act has gone through a rigorous counseling process after review by a Joint Parliamentary Committee. Many of the previous judicial decisions have been investigated, and all aspects have been investigated in depth. Earlier, during the passage of CAA and canceling Article 370, there was a similar storm – both were challenged in the court and they did not meet in the judicial investigation.

When the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) was passed and when abolishing Article 370, the dream of a nation, a constitution was realized and the opposition still created a similar storm. Petitions were filed in the court, a judicial review was demanded, but the constitutionality and legal validity of these decisions came to the forefront of the judiciary. Today history is witness that these decisions are not only legal firm, but have also proved to be a decisive step towards national unity, security and civil rights.